That would get you the volume, not the mass. You would have to multiply your cubic centimeter volume by 1.2 to get the actual answer in grams (approximately based on typical paper density.)
Though creating a rudimentary balance and using a measuring cup full of water on the opposite side of the book would be less messy.
That would get you the volume, not the mass. You would have to multiply your cubic centimeter volume by 1.2 to get the actual answer in grams (approximately based on typical paper density.)
Though creating a rudimentary balance and using a measuring cup full of water on the opposite side of the book would be less messy.